Skip to main content

Whatever happened to the 3 Rs?

When I was a child, the new 3 Rs were introduced to us in school: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle.

Since then we haven't stopped hearing about recycling. The other two, however -- arguably the more effective of the strategies -- have been much more muted. Recycling has caught on while the others haven't because the only change to lifestyle or mindset necessary is spending an extra few seconds thinking about which garbage can to put waste into. We can keep getting new things, keep using stuff, but with less guilt now, because we can recycle them!

Reducing has gained a bit of attention through new technologies which make it fun by necessitating the purchase of new things. Far more fun that simply acquiring less, we reduce by buying new high-efficiency lightbulbs, toilets, windows, washing machines, cars, the list goes on.

I'm not arguing that these things have no value, because they certainly are a step in the right direction. But they fail to achieve the shift in thinking and acting that will really be necessary to prevent us from utterly destroying God's beautiful creation.

Reusing has been a well-known strategy among the frugal for years, and it remains mostly with them. Mennonites have been facilitating this mode through thrift stores for years. More recently, Value Village got in on the idea, and consignment stores/second hand boutiques are beginning to pop up, so at least in the field of clothing, some are starting to get the picture. But we've got a long way to go.

Technology is one area where this problem is noticeable. On the one hand, technology has been used to create a lot of green technology, like all the high efficiency appliances. But on the other hand, technology also produces a lot of waste, much of it toxic. Computers and their accessories are a great example. Within a year or two, your brand new machine is outdated to obsolete and is more cheaply replaced than repaired. Technological innovations are now cheap enough to be accessible to the common man -- isn't it time for the brilliant minds to turn their efforts to innovations to facilitate economical repair and reuse of machines? After all, the average person isn't even aware of, much less have the capacity to use all the specialized features included in our computers, printers, phones, and iPods. Nevertheless, we keep updating our toys with the newest model, without a thought to what kind of effect our technological waste may be having on the environment.

So with all the buzz about "green" these days, let's remember our three Rs -- and not neglect to practice all of them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Our pensions for ICE? Stop it now!

A campaign from LeadNow with a few spicy sentences from me. The CPP is funded by the wages of 22 million people across the country, LeadNow says, and the Investment Board has a responsibility to ensure those savings are not used in ways people fundamentally reject. Dear Mr. John Graham, CEO of CPPIB, and CPPIB board members, I am writing as a contributor to the Canada Pension Plan—one of millions of people whose wages fund this plan and whose future depends on it. This is our CPP, and it must answer to us. I am horrified that CPP investments include companies linked to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). In effect, the people who pay into CPP are having their own money used to help fund Trump-era immigration enforcement and the harms associated with it. Canadians are appalled by the actions of ICE. What a betrayal you would use our own money to fund these bullies violating human rights.  CPP is not abstract capital—it is our deferred wages. Contributors should not ...

Stop the bank

World Beyond War is leading a campaign endorsed by 32 other organizations including Mennonite Action Canada to oppose the Defense, Security and Resilience Bank.  Learn more about the campaign here Or use their template to send your own letter as I did (with tweaks) World Beyond War letter template I am calling for you – Mr Carney, M Champagne, Mr Long, Mr McGuinty – to reject the DSRB. (My MP I trust, is already opposing it.) The proposed war bank would provide a steady flow of public and private funds to weapons manufacturers to facilitate a rapid expansion of military production. Making money off death! The institution’s mandate – to raise public-private funding towards increasing the manufacturing and procurement of weapons – is fundamentally at odds with hopes for a peaceful world. Moreover, the DSRB will mark an escalation in public spending on weapons and militarism, drawing money away from critical spending.  The DSRB would redirect public money away from urgent social ...

The anti-bike blog

OR I do not think [that word] means what you think it means It has become a weekly, almost daily occurrence. A how-to article or blog post will come across my path – usually in my facebook feed – touting the wonders of winter cycling. Not one to learn a lesson quickly, I keep clicking on them. Inevitably, I navigate away in frustration. It’s fun! It’s easy! Anyone can do it! You don’t need special gear; you can even look chic while you’re doing it. Oh, and get off your high horse – being a winter cyclist doesn’t make you special. This is the message of all these articles. Lies, I tell you. Now, far be it from me to dissuade people from cycling, but I think we may need different words for the varying circumstances that fall under the umbrella term “winter cycling.” Take Vancouver and Seattle, for example, where bicycle enthusiasts will talk about “winter” cycling. I’ll grant you that a bone-chilling, relentless, drenching rain is its own special brand of miserable to bi...