Skip to main content

The fallacy of choice

I've been wondering lately if choice isn't becoming our ruin. As Westerners, we're under this delusion that we get to choose. We have freedom of choice, we assert. We get to vote. We can choose brand names, products, stores, cable packages, payment plans. Oh, the choices!

And more. We get to choose who we marry. (And having chosen, unchoose when things don't work out as planned.)

We get to choose when we have children, and whether, and maybe even who they are -- or, perhaps more accurately, who they are not.

And now we want to choose when we die.

But do we really get to choose? Are we really in control of all this? I'm not arguing for some overly-deterministic, fatalistic perspective on life, only for a dose of reality.

There's a saying that you can't choose your family but you can choose your friends. But can you honestly say you've chosen each of your friends? You fall in with a group of people, or are thrown together with a group of people, and relationship develops. Sure, in some cases, you are intentional about spending time with those people to form those relationships, but overall, you meet who you meet, and some of them become your friends.

It's a simple example, but maybe it helps to dislodge the idea we're in control of everything. A lot of our experience is the product of circumstance, not design. In the meantime, however, this delusion of control has led us to also believe we are in control of our unhappiness.

I'm not arguing for some really passive take on life that eschews taking initiative to change your situation and your attitude, but the opposite. I'm arguing against the perception of taking control that prizes personal choice over commitment to relationship, others' well-being, and sacrifice. Ironically, our options for changing unhappiness lie not so much in the circumstances (which we think we've chosen), as in the attitudes (which we deny we can control).

"In a perfect world...," we say, as though we actually have a wide enough vision to conceive of what a perfect world would look like. Aren't the unexpected people and events in your life -- the ones you'd never have chosen, the people and events which at first blush look like imperfections -- the ones from which you grow the most, or draw the most meaningful, or sometimes just plain fun, experiences?

Would it really be all that great if we got to choose everything?

This fallacy of choice, I believe, contributes to divorces, abortions, infertility desperation, and now a growing call for euthanasia. If things don't go as we want, we choose a different path. We un-choose what was chosen. We fight tooth and nail to get what we have chosen but haven't yet received.

And we choose to not choose unpleasantness. Death? Well, that's not an option, but how to die? It's the last choice available to us. In our feebleness and frailty, whether from disease or old age, we want to exercise that one last bit of control. When it feels like all other choices have slipped away, at least we can hold on to choosing when to die. But with our history, is that wise?

Let's not stop choosing. No, let's not stop choosing beauty, relationships, joy, life, God. And in choosing God, let's let him make the decisions that are too big for us. Let's leave for his wisdom the choices we can't possibly make for ourselves, perfect world or not.

Comments

lasselanta said…
Beautiful post. Have you read the novel "Descent into Hell" by Charles Williams? Some interesting thoughts there about "loving the Fact" that fit in with what you have said here.
kar0ling said…
Thanks, Sharon. No, I haven't read it, or heard of it, I'm afraid. It looks quite fascinating, though; perhaps I'll have to look into it. Was he an Inkling?
lasselanta said…
Yes, he was-- good friend of C. S. Lewis in particular (the third book in Lewis's science fiction trilogy was heavily influenced by Williams). Worth reading and pondering. :-)

Popular posts from this blog

Keep Canada a country of welcome

We're supposed to be grateful that we got a Liberal government instead of a Conservative one that would scapegoat immigrants. However, even under Trudeau, Liberals had subtly started to send the disgustingly popular message that Canada's social ills can be traced to our newcomer population, when in fact, in both housing and education (favourite victims of the blame immigrant narrative), the real villain is the federal government's funding cut backs.  And now Carney is blaming immigrants for health care too. Now he's claiming we can't afford to pay for health care for immigrants (as though we can afford to waste human potential by allowing folks to languish in untreated illness for lack of funds!) So here's a letter to the PM and the immigration minister to protest the cuts to immigration. This time from MCC. Mine, of course, has my own flavour added.  Click here to send your own. I am writing to you to ask that you keep Canada as a country of welcome.  Stop bl...

No more public money for LNG

It’s just so ludicrous that we’d be sending any public money to fossil fuel extraction. It doesn’t even make financial sense with major Asian markets ramping up solar and wind. And that's beyond the known climate change consequences of continued extraction.   So, another adapted form letter, thanks to Stand for earth.  Write your own here I am writing to urge you to reject any investment, financing, or de-risking of new LNG projects in Canada. I am sick and tired of public money flowing to subsidize fossil fuel extraction.  It does not benefit ordinary Canadians.  It is known to contribute to global warming – the effects of which we are already feeling with a huge increase in disastrous climate events which are costly and harmful. It doesn’t even make financial sense because the market is drying up. The rest of the world is smart enough to switch to renewables.  You are continuing to dehumanize Indigenous peoples by running roughshod over their territory a...

Ecological disaster through data centres nobody even wants

Glitchy products that never do what they say are bad enough, and then they add genocide into the mix. But what real options are there to Microsoft? Another (adapted) form letter from Stand for earth. Write your own here You’ve trapped us all into being forced to use MS for word processing since you simply drove all the competition out of the marketplace with injust business practices. The least you can do it not lie to us about your supposed commitments to green energy sourcing.  I was disgusted to hear Microsoft struck a 20 year deal with Chevron to supply massive amounts of polluting methane gas for a data centre in Texas. Microsoft used to pretend to have climate commitments by setting goals far off in the future so you could keep kicking the can down the road and never meeting them. But now you're not even pretending to try, Now it’s pursuit of ecological disaster through unnecessary AI data centres nobody even wants to use.  I’m asking: please start listening to the commu...