Skip to main content

A quick letter on pipelines

I open a lot of emails, skim the alarmed subject lines and the paragraphs denouncing the action government is either taking or failing to take, then click to sign the letter they have drafted to send.

Sometimes I add my own spice (as is amply demonstrated on this blog). 

This time they were inviting me to submit a letter to the editor to several publications instead, so here I go!

It's fairly off-the-cuff so I highly doubt it'll be published anywhere, but if Stand for Earth is right that 60% of people in Canada don't want a publicly funded pipeline (depressingly low when you think about it; but I suspect most of the other 40% just don't even understand what's at stake or care to even try to understand), then we need our media to start reflecting that in their reporting. If some letters to the editor help newspapers gauge public sentiment to guide their reporting, then I hope this adds to the weight of opinion in a good way. 

Prime Minister Carney says we can't afford to meet the extremely weak climate targets the previous Liberal government agreed to. Has he looked at the damage from forest fires, floods and severe weather from tornadoes to simply severe thunderstorms? What was the cost of thousands of Winnipeggers without power for 8-48 hours this past week? And that wasn't even the first mass outage this summer? How much has climate change already cost us in evacuations and insurance claims alone?

Carney and Premier Wab Kinew smile reassuringly and say we'll rebuild from these disasters, but how about also addressing what's causing the damage? We don't have enough reserve to keep rebuilding at this rate -- and it's only going to get worse. And yet they're both salivating to use taxpayer money to expand the pipelines that are at the heart of climate change. 

Canadians didn't vote Liberal in 2025 for more pipelines. We never agreed to buying the first one which has turned out as disastrously as predicted. We certainly didn't agree to buying this one. 

Every public dollar spent subsidizing fossil fuels is a dollar not spent on healthcare, housing, public transit, or preparing communities for climate disasters.

We simply can't afford not to make climate change a key consideration in all decision making. That starts with just saying no to any and all fossil fuel expansion plans. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Keep Canada a country of welcome

We're supposed to be grateful that we got a Liberal government instead of a Conservative one that would scapegoat immigrants. However, even under Trudeau, Liberals had subtly started to send the disgustingly popular message that Canada's social ills can be traced to our newcomer population, when in fact, in both housing and education (favourite victims of the blame immigrant narrative), the real villain is the federal government's funding cut backs.  And now Carney is blaming immigrants for health care too. Now he's claiming we can't afford to pay for health care for immigrants (as though we can afford to waste human potential by allowing folks to languish in untreated illness for lack of funds!) So here's a letter to the PM and the immigration minister to protest the cuts to immigration. This time from MCC. Mine, of course, has my own flavour added.  Click here to send your own. I am writing to you to ask that you keep Canada as a country of welcome.  Stop bl...
Post a Comment
Read more

No more public money for LNG

It’s just so ludicrous that we’d be sending any public money to fossil fuel extraction. It doesn’t even make financial sense with major Asian markets ramping up solar and wind. And that's beyond the known climate change consequences of continued extraction.   So, another adapted form letter, thanks to Stand for earth.  Write your own here I am writing to urge you to reject any investment, financing, or de-risking of new LNG projects in Canada. I am sick and tired of public money flowing to subsidize fossil fuel extraction.  It does not benefit ordinary Canadians.  It is known to contribute to global warming – the effects of which we are already feeling with a huge increase in disastrous climate events which are costly and harmful. It doesn’t even make financial sense because the market is drying up. The rest of the world is smart enough to switch to renewables.  You are continuing to dehumanize Indigenous peoples by running roughshod over their territory a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ecological disaster through data centres nobody even wants

Glitchy products that never do what they say are bad enough, and then they add genocide into the mix. But what real options are there to Microsoft? Another (adapted) form letter from Stand for earth. Write your own here You’ve trapped us all into being forced to use MS for word processing since you simply drove all the competition out of the marketplace with injust business practices. The least you can do it not lie to us about your supposed commitments to green energy sourcing.  I was disgusted to hear Microsoft struck a 20 year deal with Chevron to supply massive amounts of polluting methane gas for a data centre in Texas. Microsoft used to pretend to have climate commitments by setting goals far off in the future so you could keep kicking the can down the road and never meeting them. But now you're not even pretending to try, Now it’s pursuit of ecological disaster through unnecessary AI data centres nobody even wants to use.  I’m asking: please start listening to the commu...
Post a Comment
Read more