Skip to main content

A quick letter on pipelines

I open a lot of emails, skim the alarmed subject lines and the paragraphs denouncing the action government is either taking or failing to take, then click to sign the letter they have drafted to send.

Sometimes I add my own spice (as is amply demonstrated on this blog). 

This time they were inviting me to submit a letter to the editor to several publications instead, so here I go!

It's fairly off-the-cuff so I highly doubt it'll be published anywhere, but if Stand for Earth is right that 60% of people in Canada don't want a publicly funded pipeline (depressingly low when you think about it; but I suspect most of the other 40% just don't even understand what's at stake or care to even try to understand), then we need our media to start reflecting that in their reporting. If some letters to the editor help newspapers gauge public sentiment to guide their reporting, then I hope this adds to the weight of opinion in a good way. 

Prime Minister Carney says we can't afford to meet the extremely weak climate targets the previous Liberal government agreed to. Has he looked at the damage from forest fires, floods and severe weather from tornadoes to simply severe thunderstorms? What was the cost of thousands of Winnipeggers without power for 8-48 hours this past week? And that wasn't even the first mass outage this summer? How much has climate change already cost us in evacuations and insurance claims alone?

Carney and Premier Wab Kinew smile reassuringly and say we'll rebuild from these disasters, but how about also addressing what's causing the damage? We don't have enough reserve to keep rebuilding at this rate -- and it's only going to get worse. And yet they're both salivating to use taxpayer money to expand the pipelines that are at the heart of climate change. 

Canadians didn't vote Liberal in 2025 for more pipelines. We never agreed to buying the first one which has turned out as disastrously as predicted. We certainly didn't agree to buying this one. 

Every public dollar spent subsidizing fossil fuels is a dollar not spent on healthcare, housing, public transit, or preparing communities for climate disasters.

We simply can't afford not to make climate change a key consideration in all decision making. That starts with just saying no to any and all fossil fuel expansion plans. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Electioneering again

Climate anxiety has entered the lexicon. For the last few years, it’s been talked about more and more in news articles, science discussions and even in spiritual care contexts. I shrugged it off as overly sensitive people, but the shoe has dropped for me now too. Extreme weather or one sort another everywhere all at once for the past few years has brought home what I always acknowledged intellectually but didn’t really synthesized emotionally: climate change is actually coming and it will be bad. I feel so angry and impotent in the face of these massive systems working against my small efforts to reduce waste and burn less carbon. So I went to the climate forum for this provincial election. It felt really important just to be in the room to declare “this subject matters!” The room had a remarkable number of grey hairs in it. This brought up terribly mixed feelings for me. On the one hand, good of them to continue to care about these issues, even as they can anticipate it won’t ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Broken people...

After reflecting with one coworker on how often churches in all their forms really mess up and hurt a whole bunch of people in the process -- and how "we gotta do better" -- I stumbled into another conversation with a coworker which highlighted our brokenness, and I suddenly realized what was wrong with my take in the first. I wanted the church to be better at fixing our mistakes, or better yet, at not making them in the first place. But maybe this "fix-it" attitude is partly the reason we keep blowing it again and again! My friend recollected an experience when a church community was in a terrible place: compounded mistakes, hurts, and frustrations had blown up, spewing pain all over all parties. (I'm sure anyone with a long history in the church can think of one, if not several, such occasions in their past.) A new Christian who observed all these goings on responded in an unexpected way. Instead of "you people are a bunch of screw-ups! How could this pos...
5 comments
Read more

Stand up for Canadian Health Care (such as it is)

Canadian health care is far from perfect — it has never achieved all Tommy Douglas dreamed for it: from tip to toe (teeth are still missing, as are a lot of drugs) — but unleashing unfettered two-tier is the opposite of fixing it.  So I joined with the Canadian Medical Association in pleading for the Canadian government to grow a spine and stop unhinged Smith's attempt to violate our own rules within her province.  As someone on Bluesky observed, if Stephen Harper tried to do this, we'd be at the gate with pitchforks. Where is the outrage. Daddy Warbucks Carney’s latest just-barely satisfactory performance in trade negotiations should not blind us to his failure to prevent this from happening.  The letter to the health minister, CC my MP and the shadow ministers: The Canadian Medical Association says the Canadian government must stand up for Albertans and all Canadians to ensure Alberta's new legislation doesn’t create a new normal of health care haves and have-no...
Post a Comment
Read more