Skip to main content

In support for supportive housing rezoning with reservations

Just move that little blue box off the park and onto the yawningly large and empty parking lot. Everyone is happy! :)

A letter to CoW councillors, riffing off a Right to Housing Coalition letter campaign:

https://actionnetwork.org/letters/in-support-of-supportive-housing-rezoning

on this proposal:

https://www.winnipeg.ca/building-development/housing/housing-accelerator-fund/city-sites-supportive-housing 

Why do we make parks fight with housing while parking lots get a free pass?

There's a lot of horrific “not in my backyard” rhetoric about the proposed supportive housing sites, so I am writing to support supportive housing. Yes, I support rezoning of City-owned properties to support the construction of supportive housing.

I also strongly support the sale or long-term lease of these properties to non-profit housing providers at nominal rates. The City has a key role to play in addressing the housing needs of Winnipeg residents and this is an important way to support to our neighbours who face barriers in accessing housing they can afford.

Housing **with on-site support for residents** helps people maintain their housing, increasing the health, safety, and wellbeing of our community as whole.

Generally, I urge you to support the Rezoning for Supportive Housing.

However, I’ve got one caveat about the Sherburn site. It’s a great neighbourhood to choose: close to Downtown; easy access to bus routes to travel around the city, a nice neighbourhood feel where real humans walk around and greet each other. This is perfect for one one-lot sized supportive housing location.

Except you’re trying to put it on an existing park. A park that is part of what makes this such a great location. A park that is good for humans, just like housing is good for humans.

Why would we pit housing against a park when literally across the back alley is almost a block-worth of parking lot that is never ever full? Wasted space in the heart of the city. Space taken away from human flourishing so that a few privileged individuals can have the convenience of storing their excessively large, most-wasteful-form-of-transportation machines for hours at a time between usages of mere minutes.

Instead of fighting the public with their variety of reasons why they don't want this project built on this spot on Sherburn (some reasonable, some exaggerated fears, some downright discriminatory and unkind), why not put your “fight” energy into negotiating appropriation of parking lot space on which to place to crucially needed supportive housing (so it doesn't take away also much needed park space)?

There’s two parking lots in question, one belonging to Kingdom Hall and one belonging to a First Nation. At peak times, each of these lots may be full. But those peak times are limited and – importantly – they don’t overlap with each other. It would likely only require removing 4-6 spaces to place the housing project on this vacant land on Garfield/Wolever instead of the highly valued park land on Sherburn.

Why not help the church and the nation broker a sharing agreement where the church can demarcate specific hours when they have priority use of their lot (during the church services, regular church meetings, etc.), and the rest of the week, overflow from the other lot is allowed. And vice versa: should the church lot fill up, they can park in the other lot. And while all this negotiation is going on, the parking for the supportive housing unit can also work out an agreement with the two lots to ensure the spaces needed are available without encroaching on the neighbours’ needs. 

With this strategy, everyone wins: 
--> the neighbourhood keeps its park
--> supportive housing is built in a core city neighbourhood
--> neighbouring property owners with overlapping usage learn to collaborate and share resources.

Please don't make Winnipeggers choose between two goods (housing, green space) when a wasteful drain-on-resources utilitarian land use (parking lot) gets more space than is warranted.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Winnipeg Transit woes

  “We’ve increased support for municipalities year after year because we know strong communities depend on reliable, stable and predictable funding increases,” Municipal and Northern Relations Minister Glen Simard said in an emailed statement to the Free Press Tuesday. https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/2026/06/23/winnipeg-transit-needs-funding-boost-additional-staff-to-follow-new-provincial-accessibility-regulations-city-report This in answer to City of Winnipeg chair of Public Works Janice Lukes plea for the province to cough up money for the needed upgrades. Listen carefully because these are words I won't often say: I gotta agree with Lukes on this one. If the province is handing down new standards, given their higher capacity for raising revenues, they ought to help the city fund meeting said standards. What Simard fails to acknowledge is that those "year after year" funding increases started at the bottom basement after Conservative cuts and likely h...
Post a Comment
Read more

more journalistic malpractice from Canada's national broadcaster

The government has just rammed through legislation to turn Canada into a police surveillance state where all the democratic and processed based guard-rails have been removed.  They used some legislative loophole to force a vote on amendments without debate at a committee meeting at midnight. But this is what the front page of our national broadcaster's news site looks like. Do you see any mention of Bill C-22? Do you see any word of a midnight SECU session with a forced vote? Do you see any mention of MPs in tears at how democracy is being shredded before their very eyes? Do you see anything removing about all legal protections against having your data intercepted, read and kept on file (in a word of hackers and data breaches)? Do you see anything about how experts in Australia (who have already gone partway down the path Canada has just widened, flatted, and turned into a racetrack) are warning Canadians not to do this? No. The CBC is spineless. Just a mouthpiece for whoever wield...
Post a Comment
Read more

Letter writing success

Last week, several sources linked to a letter appealing to venerable Canadian scientist and nature advocate David Suzuki to withdraw from a supposed climate prize due to its deep ties to an unbashedly colonlialist Israeli organization. The JNF's claim to fame is planting trees in Israel. Pine trees. Non-native trees. Trees that are susceptible to wildfires. Trees intentionally planted atop forcibly-emptied Palestinian villages to try to erase their memory.  The letters worked. Suzuki withdrew. I hadn't gotten around to writing before I got the news. So when a follow up letter to other participants in the prize hit my inbox, I rushed to put my own spin on the letter and sign it. Send your own here I urge you to join David Suzuki in withdrawing from the upcoming Climate Solutions Prize (CSP) festival. CSP was instigated by the racist Jewish National Fund (JNF) of Canada with support from the Israeli government. Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennet announced the launch of CSP...
Post a Comment
Read more